Primary Institutional Sources
Leading research directly informing AGI governance frameworks
Requirements for Global Governance of AGI
Comprehensive real-time Delphi study with 229 expert respondents from 65 countries. Identifies 41 requirements for AGI governance systems, national licensing procedures, and multilateral coordination. Evaluated five governance models and documented expert consensus on effective AGI administration.
Global Governance of the Transition to AGI
Published by De Gruyter Brill. Extensive international assessment drawing on over 55 AGI experts including industry leaders, government officials, and academic researchers. Documents governance requirements emerging from global expert consensus and institutional analysis.
UN High-Level Expert Panel Report on AGI
Official UN report on governance of AGI transition. Proposes Global AGI Observatory for capability monitoring, international certification system for AGI systems, and UN Framework Convention on AGI. Represents multilateral consensus on governance structure.
Academic & Peer-Reviewed Research
Scholarly research on AGI governance, ethics, and institutional design
AI Governance in the Era of Agentic AI and AGI
Examines ethical, regulatory, and technical dimensions of governing autonomous AI systems. Documents policy gaps: only 10-15% of safety research addresses post-deployment impacts. Proposes integrated governance frameworks addressing agentic AI emergence.
A Strategic Foresight Approach to Ethical AI Governance
Synthesizes anticipatory governance frameworks for AGI. Examines stage-gate approaches, cross-functional integration, and mechanisms for balancing innovation with risk management. Proposes constitutional safeguards for AGI transition.
Institutional Frameworks for AGI Capability Assessment
Develops methodologies for systematic evaluation of AGI system capabilities and emerging behaviors. Provides technical frameworks for early warning systems and capability monitoring. Documents thresholds triggering governance escalation.
Policy & Legal Frameworks
Government and regulatory policy documents on AI and AGI governance
EU AI Act: Regulating Artificial Intelligence
Comprehensive regulatory framework establishing risk-based approach to AI governance. Categorizes systems by risk level with corresponding compliance requirements. Serves as model for national AI legislation globally.
Comparative AI Governance: EU and China Models
Comparative analysis of EU AI Act and China's Model AI Law. Identifies convergences in transparency requirements while documenting divergent approaches to accountability and public engagement. Implications for global governance standards.
OECD AI Principles and Governance Guidelines
International policy recommendations on AI governance emphasizing transparency, human autonomy, and institutional accountability. Provides implementation guidance for member countries developing national AI strategies.
International & Multilateral Research
Research from international organizations and multilateral institutions
Global AI Governance Framework Assessment
Analysis of existing governance frameworks and identification of gaps in AGI oversight. Documents need for binding international agreements on AGI development and deployment standards. Recommends enhanced multilateral coordination mechanisms.
Building Trust in AI Through Governance Innovation
Examines governance innovation enabling responsible AI development. Documents multi-stakeholder collaboration models, public-private partnership frameworks, and mechanisms for emerging market participation in global governance.
International AI Governance Initiative Research Synthesiss>
The Stanford Institute for Human-Centered AI (HAI)
Comprehensive synthesis of AGI governance research from academic and policy institutions globally. Maps governance approaches, identifies convergences and divergences, proposes mechanisms for harmonization while respecting jurisdictional diversity.